The Diagnostician Question · Oregon · 2026

The diagnostician question in Oregon

Who can give the autism diagnosis in Oregon, and what happens to your ownership if you bring that diagnostician in-house, with the operative statute quoted verbatim. This page carries what is specific to Oregon; the framework, the structure, and the 17-state comparison are in the diagnostician question hub.

Important · This is not legal advice

This page is general educational information about corporate-practice, professional-entity, and anti-kickback law as it affects applied behavior analysis practices in Oregon. It is not legal, tax, or business advice, it creates no attorney-client relationship, and it is not produced by an attorney. Confirm the verbatim text against the current official code and engage qualified healthcare-regulatory and tax counsel before acting.

🧩
Oregon · classification
Flip on in-house, hardest

A physician diagnostician flips ownership hard and the standard fix is itself under attack; a psychologist is lighter but still restricted. Flip, hardest: separate licensee-owned diagnostic entity, and watch SB 951.

Who may give the diagnosis in Oregon

The medical-necessity diagnosis is made by a licensed physician or a licensed psychologist. A BCBA may not diagnose ASD, so the diagnostician you would bring in-house is a psychologist or a physician, and both are professions the state may treat differently from behavior analysis.

How Oregon treats psychology and medicine ownership

Oregon's 1947 doctrine requires physicians to hold the majority of a medical professional corporation's voting shares, and SB 951 and HB 3410 (2025) go further than most by attacking the friendly-professional-corporation and management-company structure itself, limiting ownership overlap and stock-transfer-restriction agreements. SB 951 is scoped to medicine and nursing, so a psychologist-based structure can sit outside its worst restrictions while still facing professional-corporation ownership under ORS 58.

Verbatim, ORS 58.375(1)(a)Physicians who are licensed in this state to practice medicine must hold the majority of each class of shares that are entitled to vote.
Verbatim, ORS 58.015(7)'Professional service' means personal service or services rendered in this state to the public which may be lawfully rendered only pursuant to a license by a professional.
Verbatim, ORS 63.074(2)Subject to the laws of the state, the rules and regulations of a regulatory board of a profession, if any, and the standards of professional conduct of the profession, if any, a limited liability company or members of the limited liability company may render professional service in this state.

What bringing the diagnostician in-house does

A physician diagnostician flips ownership hard and the standard fix is itself under attack; a psychologist is lighter but still restricted. Flip, hardest: separate licensee-owned diagnostic entity, and watch SB 951.

How to structure it in Oregon

Keep the ABA entity ABA-only and non-licensee owned, and put the diagnosis in a separate licensee-owned entity connected through a management company on fair-market-value, not volume-based, terms so the referral survives the federal Anti-Kickback Statute; or rely on an outside referral with no remuneration flowing for the referral. If the diagnostician is a physician and the payer is Medicaid, the federal physician self-referral rules add a layer that a psychologist does not trigger. The full three-entity structure is set out in the diagnostician question hub.

Confirm current requirements directly

The corporate-practice, professional-entity, and anti-kickback rules summarized here are amended and reinterpreted, and verbatim text is a starting point rather than a conclusion. The official Oregon code, the applicable federal safe harbor, and qualified healthcare-regulatory and tax counsel are the authoritative sources.

Last updated July 2026. The diagnosis-authority and diagnostician-ownership question for ABA practices in Oregon, with the operative provision quoted verbatim from the official code. Statutes and safe harbors change and are interpreted by agencies and courts. Nothing here is legal, tax, or financial advice. Confirm against the official code and consult qualified counsel before structuring a diagnosis-and-treatment arrangement.