Statutory Source Reference · New York · 2026

The professional-entity decision for ABA in New York

New York licenses behavior analysts under Article 167 of the Education Law, and its professional-entity statutes require a same-profession-owned PC, PLLC, or LLP for any licensed profession, with no room for outside equity. This is one of the strictest ownership regimes covered in this guide. Below are the provisions, verbatim.

Important · Not legal advice; do not rely on this without a lawyer

This page is general educational information, not legal, tax, or financial advice, and it is not produced by an attorney. Reading it creates no attorney-client relationship. The verdict is an interpretation of statutes that are amended, repealed, and reinterpreted by courts and agencies, and that apply differently to the specific facts of any practice, so it may be incomplete, outdated, or wrong. Verbatim text should be confirmed against the current official code. Do not form an entity, raise capital, buy or sell a practice, or make any other decision in reliance on this page. Engage a licensed attorney in New York before acting.

⚖️
New York · summary and verdict
New York licenses behavior analysts under Article 167 of the Education Law, administered by NYSED rather than a health board, and that licensure pulls ABA directly into New York's professional-entity regime. A licensee may form a professional corporation, a professional service limited liability company, or a registered limited liability partnership, but membership in every one of those entities is restricted to persons licensed in the same profession under Article 167. There is no allied-profession exception and no minority lay-ownership carve-out. A non-licensee may not hold any equity interest in an entity organized to render applied behavior analysis services in New York.

The five rows below carry the operative statutory language verbatim, each quote pulled from the official code. This page is one state from the full state-by-state reference. Nothing here is legal, tax, or financial advice.

The five-part test in brief

Whether an ABA practice needs a professional entity is a stack of five questions. The licensing act is the gateway, because an unlicensed profession is generally not a professional service and an ordinary entity governs. The professional-entity statute supplies the form and the ownership rule that applies if that form is used. The scope definition decides whether ABA is actually inside that statute. The corporate-practice doctrine, a separate body of law that often lives in the medical practice act or case law rather than the entity statute, is usually what forces licensed ownership and pushes outside capital into a management company. And the fee-splitting and anti-remuneration rules constrain management-fee economics even where ownership is open. The rows below run those five against this state's actual code, quoting the operative language so the position rests on the statute.

New York, provision by provision

New York

Strict: same-profession ownership only, no lay equity

Holding: an ABA entity in New York must be a professional corporation, PLLC, or LLP, and every owner must be licensed under Article 167. No non-licensee, whether an individual investor, a management company, or an allied licensed professional, may hold equity in the clinical entity.

1Licensed Profession2Prof Entity State3ABA Prof Entity4Non Professional Ownership5Fee splitting
1Is ABA a licensed profession?

Yes. New York licenses Licensed Behavior Analysts and Certified Behavior Analyst Assistants under Article 167 of the Education Law, effective July 1, 2014, administered by NYSED's Office of the Professions. Only a person licensed, certified, or exempt under Article 167 may practice applied behavior analysis in New York.

Conclusion. ABA is a licensed profession in New York, the gateway that pulls it into every downstream entity rule that follows.

2The professional-entity rule: is one required, and who may own it

A licensee may form a professional corporation, a professional service limited liability company, or a registered limited liability partnership, but not an ordinary business corporation or LLC, to render applied behavior analysis services. Ownership of any of these entities is restricted entirely to persons licensed in the same profession under Article 167. There is no minority lay-ownership allowance of the kind some other states permit.

Verbatim, N.Y. LLC Law § 1203With respect to a professional service limited liability company formed to provide applied behavior analysis services as such services are defined in article 167 of the education law, each member of such limited liability company must be licensed or certified pursuant to article 167 of the education law to practice applied behavior analysis in this state.
Verbatim, N.Y. Bus. Corp. Law § 1507Shares in a professional service corporation may be issued only to individuals who are authorized by law to practice in this state a profession which such corporation is authorized to practice.

Conclusion. A professional entity is required, and ownership is restricted entirely to Article 167 licensees, with no room for a non-licensee or an allied-profession minority owner.

3Does the rule reach ABA? The scope link

The rule reaches ABA by name, not by general category. New York's LLC Law and Business Corporation Law were amended to specifically address applied behavior analysis services as defined in Article 167, rather than relying on a general "professional service" definition that ABA might or might not fit into. This is a direct, unambiguous scope link.

Conclusion. ABA is expressly and specifically named in New York's professional-entity statutes, leaving no interpretive gap on whether the rule applies.

4Corporate-practice doctrine and ownership by law

Ownership. New York's corporate-practice doctrine is unusually direct for ABA specifically: the professional-entity statutes name applied behavior analysis services and require every member or shareholder to be an Article 167 licensee, with no allied-profession or minority lay-ownership exception written into the ABA-specific provisions the way some other New York professions receive. A non-licensee, including a management company, a private-equity fund, or an individual investor, cannot hold direct equity in the clinical entity.

Clinical control. Because ownership itself is restricted to licensees, clinical control follows automatically; there is no separate doctrine needed to force licensed control of the practice, the entity statute does that work directly. New York does carry a narrower administrative pathway worth noting: NYSED maintains waiver provisions letting approved special-education schools and early-intervention provider agencies, which may deliver ABA among other services, contract with a PC or PLLC, or organize as an education corporation, under a different regulatory track than a private-pay clinical practice.

Verbatim, N.Y. LLC Law § 1207 (parallel provision, other Article 163/167 professions)With respect to a professional service limited liability company formed to provide applied behavior analysis services as such services are defined in article 167 of the education law, each member of such limited liability company must be licensed or certified pursuant to article 167 of the education law to practice applied behavior analysis in this state.

Conclusion. Ownership of an ABA professional entity in New York is restricted entirely to Article 167 licensees. No non-licensee may hold equity in the clinical entity outside the narrower special-education or early-intervention waiver track.

5Fee-splitting and illegal remuneration

New York carries a general fee-splitting prohibition applicable to all NYSED-licensed professions: a licensed professional or professional firm may not share with anyone outside the firm's own members the fees earned for professional services. A narrower statute, Education Law Section 6509-a, separately prohibits referral-based fee-splitting for a specifically enumerated list of health professions; behavior analysts are not named in that enumerated list, but the general prohibition under Section 6509(9) and Regents Rule 29.1(b)(4) applies to every licensed profession under NYSED's jurisdiction, ABA included.

Verbatim, Regents Rule 8 NYCRR § 29.1(b)(4)Practicing the profession while... splitting fees, or agreeing to split fees, for professional services with any person for bringing or referring a client... except as otherwise provided by law for that profession.

Conclusion. A management fee paid to an MSO by a New York ABA professional entity must not be structured as fee-splitting for referrals; it should be a defensible fair-market-value payment for actual management services, separate from any referral relationship.

Holding and chain of reasoning

ABA is a licensed profession in New York (axis one), and the professional-entity statutes name applied behavior analysis services directly, requiring a PC, PLLC, or LLP with membership restricted to Article 167 licensees (axes two and three). That ownership restriction functions as New York's corporate-practice doctrine for ABA; there is no separate common-law layer to analyze because the entity statute itself does the work, and clinical control follows ownership automatically (axis four). A general NYSED fee-splitting prohibition constrains management-fee structuring on top of the ownership rule (axis five). Therefore an ABA entity in New York must be a professional corporation, PLLC, or LLP, wholly owned by Article 167 licensees, with no non-licensee equity of any kind in the clinical entity.


Outlook: how this verdict could change

Likelihood of change: Low. New York's professional-entity rules for ABA are recently codified and specific by name, and there is no indication of pending legislation to loosen same-profession ownership. States with this level of statutory specificity tend to be the most durable, not the most likely to shift.

What to watch. Any amendment to LLC Law § 1203 or Business Corporation Law § 1507 touching applied behavior analysis, and any expansion of the special-education or early-intervention waiver pathway to reach private-pay clinical practice more broadly.

Disruption if it changes: High. Because ownership is currently all-or-nothing, licensee-only, any loosening (an allied-profession exception, a minority lay-ownership carve-out) would be a first-time structural option for New York operators rather than an incremental adjustment, and would likely trigger significant deal activity if it occurred.


Where professional advice is essential, not optional

Verbatim statutory text is a starting point, not a conclusion. Statutes are amended, agencies issue rules that fill them in, and courts interpret them. New York's licensee-only ownership rule is also one of the least forgiving in this guide for a private-equity or outside-capital structure; the workaround used in other strict states, a clinician-owned professional entity paired with an investor-owned management company, requires especially careful fee-splitting analysis here given the general NYSED prohibition. Use this page to locate the operative provisions and to speak from the source, then confirm the current text and citations against the official code and engage qualified New York counsel before acting. Nothing here is legal, tax, or financial advice.

Confirm current requirements directly

The provisions quoted here change and are interpreted by agencies and courts. The official New York code and qualified New York counsel are the authoritative sources. Neither this page nor any secondary source should be relied on in place of direct verification and professional advice.

Last updated August 2026. A statute-level reference for the New York ABA professional-entity and ownership question, with operative language quoted verbatim from public statutory sources. Statutes change and are interpreted by agencies and courts. Nothing here is legal, tax, or financial advice. Confirm against the official code and consult qualified counsel before relying on this information.